Phive Pointed Star

Posted by on April 10, 2017

Phive Pointed Star

Last time in Squareness Reconsidered of 6th March 2017 I wrote of the importance of John Martineau’s early work on the geometry of the crop circles. Published originally in 1993 as The Sophistication of Agriglyph Geometry it dealt comprehensively with a range of geometrical shapes but the importance of the pentagram as a controlling form was clear.

(1) Bythorn '93

1 The first crop circle pentagram. Bythorn, 5th September 1993.

Image (2) shows how, in a Celtic Cross formation at Goodworth Clatford in 1988, the pentagram with its points precisely on the orbit ring, uses its inner pentagon to size the central circle.

(2) Goodworth Clatford

2 Goodworth Clatford diagram, 1998.

It might be useful here to remind everyone of the difference between pentagrams, five pointed (3) and pentagon, five sided (4).

(3) Pentagramfish

3 PentaGRAM fish

 

(4) Pentagonfish

4 PentaGON fish

Image (5) shows the seminal Upton Scudamore quintuplet of 1987. Here the points of the star rest on a circle enclosing the formation while the central circle is located by the pentagram’s arm crossing. Interestingly, the red horizontal line bisecting the centre circle and two of the satellites also uses the pentagram lines.

(5) Upton Scudamore

5 Upton Scudamore diagram, 1987.

 

HUMANITY AND THE STAR OF LIFE

Figure (6) shows the traditional man in the star. There are many variations of this image but they all emphasise the five-fold nature of humanity and, by extension, most creatures. We have four limbs and one head. In classic numerology, five is the number of Life and thus the pentagram, the geometrical manifestation of five, is known as the Star of Life.

(6) Man in Star

6 Man in star

 

TWO UNIVERSAL RATIOS

Each of the five points of the pentagram is formed by a specific triangle. They are isosceles triangles; two of their three sides are of equal length. (7) shows one of these in detail. If the angle between the two equal sides is 36° the ratio of the shorter to the two longer sides is, inevitably, Phi the Golden Section (8).

(7) 36° isosceles

7 36° Isosceles triangle

 

(8) PHI

8 PHI

 

The second of the two fundamental ratios is 1 to 1, Unison or, as some prefer, Symmetry.

 

HUMANITY AND THE RATIOS

When we are born (9) our navel is at our mid-point. As we grow to maturity the navel migrates upwards on the body (10) taking a new permanent and proportionate position. For the infant, the navel is halfway between the feet and the crown of the head. For the adult, if we take the ground to navel as 1, then the navel to head will tend towards 0.1618, the Golden Section. “Tend towards…” because as biological creatures these ratios will be generally though never precisely approached.

(9) Navel

9 Baby

 

(10) Jessica

10 Jessica pisces

 

TIME’S MARKERS

The two ratios, the Golden Section and Unison, leave evidence of a profound and perpetual sign on our bodies (11). Phi, the Golden Section, positions the navel, the thumbprint of our forebears, the Past. In the adult the location of the genitals, the herald of our descendants, the Future, is confirmed by Unison, Symmetry.

(11) Jessica ratios

11 Jessica pisces ratios

For me this verges on magic! Not only are the two prime ratios etched on our bodies but they also locate us poetically in time.

 

BYTHORN: THE CONFIRMATION

1992 and 1993 had both been disappointing years, especially after the excitements of 1991. And then, far outside the usual territory and on 5th September 1993 long after the usual season’s end, there came news of a beautiful star formation at Bythorn in Cambridgeshire (12).

(12) Bythorn '93

12 Bythorn

Despite its distance I was able to visit Bythorn three times on one of which I measured it with John Martineau. For 1993 this was a remarkably elaborate formation. Perhaps the most intriguing feature was that, as the first realised crop circle pentagram, it confirmed John’s work of some years earlier.

Bythorn remains for me, after almost a quarter century, one of the most charmed and articulate of crop circles.

 

UPSIDE DOWN

It was, curiously, positioned the wrong way up! It was oriented exactly to the south instead of north which, in our culture, signifies upwards. Many national flags feature pentagrams; they never point down. Figure (13) shows, incongruously, the man in the inverted star.

(13) Man in Star copy

13 Upside down man

A possible interpretation would be that Bythorn warns us that humanity – for the moment at least – is upside down.

 

THE PATHWAY AS LABYRINTH

Photograph (14) shows the pathway running around one of the ten surrounding petals. This pathway was, as we shall see, an important, defining and original feature of this crop circle. It ran consistently clockwise defining the pentagram star and around the ten petals. It was exactly forty inches wide throughout its length.

(14) Bythorn path

14 Bythorn pathway

Before Bythorn, crop was either laid or standing. The Bythorn path extended the palette significantly in that it established here two clearly differentiated categories of laid crop.

Diagram (15) illustrates the route of the path through the formation. It is unicursal or single-pathed, the characteristic which separates labyrinths from mazes. The maze presents many confusing options and requires left-brain reasoning while the labyrinth offers no choices and often engenders a contemplative or meditative experience.

(15) Bythorn labyrinth '93

5 Bythorn labyrinth

The Bythorn labyrinth can be seen as five overlaid elongated hearts and (16) shows an individual heart form and how it might be approached. Starting at the bottom point of the heart you proceed, clockwise always, up the left hand straight side, you bounce over the two top lobes and descend the right hand side. At the bottom you move clockwise, bounce again over the next two lobes and continue through the whole formation. You will have noticed that the red directional pointers are all 36° isosceles triangles.

(16) Bythorn single heart '93

16 Bythorn heart

I never physically walked this labyrinthine route; by the time I understood it, the formation had been harvested. However it serves well as a meditative practice.

 

AN AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVE

Look again at the photograph of Bythorn (18). There is a ring of ten “petals” surrounding the pentagram and there are ten gaps between each pair. Five of these gaps perfectly house the five points of the pentagram but the remaining five are empty. The empty gaps are also, surprisingly, chamfered to leave a precise 36° housing (19 + 20). What could this suggest?

(17) Bythorn chamfers

17 Bythorn chamfers

 

(18) Bythorn

18 Bythorn

 

(19) Bythorn diagram

19 Bythorn diagram

 

(20) Bythorn petal 36°

20 Note: The petal itself has five edges

 

I believe that, though they have presented us with a symbolically upside-down Star of Life, they have also offered us (generous as always) an immediate and easy remedy. The position of the properly oriented north-pointing star is laid out for us; its five empty housings (21) ready to be filled.

(21) Bythorn N pointing

21 Bythorn north pointing ?

A Brazilian, Rogerio de Almeida Freitas, warned that “We are the unwanted companions in this part of the Galaxy, since we commit all sorts of crimes against the dignity of life.” Perhaps the symbolic depiction of us as wrong-way-up-mankind reinforces the de Almeida Freitas quote.

The crop circles never give advice or instruction. Instead, their veiled and enigmatic communications invariably to offer a choice.

 

A CONFIRMATION

At Bishops Cannings Down on 13th July 1997 the second crop circle pentagon appeared (22). Like its predecessor at Bythorn, the Bishops Cannings star was upside-down and pointed exactly south. While Bythorn provided tailored 36° locations for the star points, Bishop Cannings had five arrays of three bars forming 36° angle guides (23). They showed the way to easily and correctly reorientate the star. That this second pentagram seemed to confirm and reassert the messages of the first was reassuring.

(22) Bishops Cannings

22 Bishops Cannings ‘97

 

(23) B C '97 diagram

23 Bishops Cannings diagram

PENTAGRAM THREE
On 20th June 1998 the third pentagram (24) arrived at Avebury Trusloe in a corner of a field adjoining the A4 highway. Like Bythorn it had an elegant surrounding necklace of ten petals but in this case they all were simple three-sided forms without the 36 ° chamfer. Unlike Bythorn there was no defined pathway but the ground lay was spectacularly ordered. Though the formation was essentially circular its perimeter was enhanced with ten graceful shallow scallops.

(24) Avebury T. '98

24 Avebury Trusloe ‘98

I was very impressed with the north/south choices offered us by both the Bythorn and the Bishop Cannings stars and naturally I hoped that this narrative would continue here. There was no clue in the design of the crop circle itself but the true difficulty was that it somehow became impossible to sensibly read my compass in the formation. This was a routine matter that I had performed often but here, inexplicably, I could not find north!

 

BEFUDDLEMENT

The question of “crop circle befuddlement” is relevant here. People had noticed that within certain circles, left-brain reasoning activity proves to be difficult while visitors simply experiencing and contemplating the formation are never troubled. A surveyor, on returning home with his professional equipment after measuring a crop circle, found that he could not understand his own notes! A senior researcher, visiting the Barbury Castle Tree of Life of 3rd May 1997 found herself leaving the formation, bewildered and without the measurements she had specifically gone there to take. Andreas Mueller, a skilled veteran crop circle field researcher, experienced as I did, compass incongruities in the Avebury Trusloe formation.

 

TINY STARS

There was a remarkable triad of crop circles incorporating small pentagrams in 2000. The first of these (25) was seen at Silbury Hill on 24th July 2000. It was a pentagram of pentagrams, all of them (including a sixth at the centre) made up of five small and precise equilateral triangles.

(25) Silbury 24:7:00

25 Silbury Hill 24/7/00

A couple of weeks later on 7th August 2000 a restrained and elegant formation (26) arrived below the Pewsey white horse. Among other features it had an incredibly slender crescent moon and three perfect tiny pentagrams.

(26) Pewsey 7:8:00

26 Pewsey White Horse 7/8/00

The next day on 8th August the final member of the trio (27) arrived in Horton. I have a real and strong affection for this crop circle; it was placed in the nearest arable field to my home, just three minutes away.

(27) Horton 8:8:00

27 Horton 6/8/00

For many years I have put my drawings of the season’s circles on my living room wall as they were completed and I have lived though the winter with this annual wallpaper of form. After the 2000 season I noticed that the formations were somehow organising themselves into groups of three. Now clearly I am not suggesting here that the drawings were physically moving around the wall; simply, they seemed to group together usefully. There were four of these trios and I was curious to discover what kind of triangles, if any, they would make if laid out on the map.

There is neither the time nor the space to examine the four triads so I will concentrate on the small pentagram group (28). I was hoping, as you will understand, that the formations, when located, would form a perfect PHI generating isosceles triangle of 36°. It was not to be. In fact, the angle between the two long sides was 32°. However, those two sides, that is Silbury to Pewsey and Horton to Pewsey were virtually identical in length at about 6.9 miles!

(28) Triangle of Pents

28 Triangle of pentagrams

Now consider for a moment the kind of surveying, engineering and geometric skill that would be required to construct accurately in the landscape a triangle of nearly seven miles in size. Bear in mind also that all three formations at the corners of the triangles were beautifully positioned in their fields. There was no crashing into roads or hedges.

What can this mean? What can we learn from this?

Returning to the deceptively simple Horton crop circle (27). Diagram (29) shows, again, the fascination the phenomenon has with the number seven and its geometries. The red sevenfold star (a “fat” heptagram) precisely sizes and encloses the central circle while the blue sevenfold star (a “thin” heptagram) sizes the starred circle on the orbit ring (30), a green duplicate of which has been placed in the centre for clarity.

(29) Horton Thin

29 Horton heptagrams

 

(30) Horton star

30 Horton small star

Again, what might this mean? Who out there cares so profoundly about us that they need to charm us with this super-order?

 

THE 1998 DOUBLED STARS

During the 1998 there were two remarkable events which, perhaps, continued the north-or-south, upside-down-or-not narrative.

The first of these formations was at Dadford on the 4th July 1998 and featured two equally sized pentagrams overlaying a thin ring. I obviously felt that this might cast some light on the Bythorn and Bishops Cannings pair, both of which displayed a real south-pointing star and an implicit north-pointing one.

(31) Dadford 4:7:98

31 Dadford 4/7/98

Dadford was unusual in three respects. Firstly it was miles away in Buckinghamshire and it required the longest journey I ever took to a crop circle. Secondly, it was accompanied in the field by three curious logos or trademarks, at least one of which was repeated two or three times elsewhere. Finally, it was, being adjacent to the Silverstone motor racing circuit, the noisiest crop circle I ever visited!

I was anxious to discover which of the pentagrams at Dadford, the overlaid or the underlaid, pointed to the north and, to this end, I took my tape measure, notebook and above all my compass. I was convinced that Dadford would move the story forward yet here is my shameful confession. I was befuddled! I know I spent time in the formation and I know I took both measurements and bearings. But, at the end of the visit I had neither notes nor memories of either.

This disgrace, which I now freely admit, was compounded by the fact that on the 8th August a very similar formation with two overlaid pentagrams arrived at Beckhampton. Dadford’s stars were the same size but at Beckhampton the underlying pentagram was the larger. Instead of a ring, the formation overlaid a pentagon.

(32) BECKHAMPTON 8:8:98

32 Beckhampton 8/8/98

Unlike distant Dadford, Beckhampton is only moments away and now I must admit my final overwhelming shame! I never visited it. Nine years later I cannot recall what stopped me going up the road to investigate a potentially crucial formation. My friends will accept “befuddlement” while my adversaries will cry “shoddy research”.

 

A TENTATIVE HYPOTHESIS

I believe the Crop Circle phenomenon could, if it wished, take over the global media and, in the appropriate language, give us all the answers.

But like all brilliant teachers, they know that what we discover for ourselves will embody deeper meaning. And so they approach us enigmatically with metaphors, allusions, implications and symbols.

What I am clinging to is the idea that the ancient pentagram acts here, in some way, as a symbol broadly representing mankind. We have heard that we are “unwanted companions in this part of the Galaxy” and (if my idea is even remotely right) humanity is depicted, through the symbolism of the pentagram, as upside down. However, they seem always to offer us the possibility of recovery. There is always an alternatively oriented star available.

Image (33) shows the complex Ranscombe Bottom formation of 23rd July 2016. This was one of the more intricate and elaborate formations of the season, playing imaginative geometrical games with large and small pentagrams. And yet the diagram (34) shows its inexorable return to its upward or downward duality. It still offers choice.

(33) Ranscomb Bottom 23:07:16

33 Ranscombe Bottom 23/7/16

 

(34) Red and blue

34 Ranscombe Bottom diagram

6 Comments

  1. As always, I am delighted by your thoughtful musings on these topics. Thank you Michael.

    I have one more interpretation for the Silbury Hill 24 July 2000 formation. You had pointed out in the past the various workings of the number 29 and in this one it was 29+1. The most recent estimation of the number of stars in the universe is 100 octillion, which is a 1 followed by 29 zeros. Might they have been presciently referencing the entirety of the cosmos?

  2. Hi Michael

    Number 25, Silbury Hill 24/7/00 appears at first glance to be a pentagram composed of six perfect pentagrams, except that on closer inspection we will find that the pentagram at the bottom right isn’t quite as we would have expected, with one of its points being cast adrift…! And so one wonders: an error intended and with meaning or unintended?

  3. Phascinating, Michael. This needs to be read about 5 times to take it all in! I enjoy the idea of the Star of Life and the notion that the pentagrams may be pointing to a misalignment in the human condition. We only have to watch the news to see that a reorientation wouldn’t be a bad idea….

  4. thank you for these thoughts. This upside-down-up topic in relation with human kind appears so clear through your analysis. True or not, it inspires me to work again with these symbols as a graphic artist. Thanks again for your work, I appreciate it very much.

  5. Beautifully written. Thank you, dearest Michael, for taking us on an amazing journey through time, from back to the late 80ies up to today. I feel impressed how long a breath it takes to get it down with these masterpieces of geometric land art. And you are still left with a big question mark at the end, especially with regard to the work undone about Dadford and Beckhampton, which is so inspiring to me.

  6. Thank you, Michael. I always enjoy your research and observations so much. I had my own observation to the upside down pentagram that I would like to share with you. Could we interpret the pentagram also as the five senses that humanity uses? And could we say that what mankind is doing ‘wrong’ is interpreting the so called reality through what we receive with our five senses instead of understanding that we create reality through projecting with our five senses?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *